Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > Knife Forums > General M9 Bayonet Topics
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2004, 07:06 PM
Quarterbore's Avatar
Quarterbore Quarterbore is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 1,598
History of the Lan-Cay M9 Bayonet

Note: Frank Trzaska deserves most of the credit for the text that follows with contributions from Bill Porter and others. I am pulling this off my website and into this thread with the hope that I can get some help fleshing out more of the details on the LanCay history which I know is a complicated subject to study!

LanCay M9 History

Lan-Cay received it’s first contract for 30,500 M9 bayonets on 3/31/92 from the U.S. Army with an additional 21,500 bayonets added during the contract. In an effort to quickly supply the Army with new M9 bayonets after Desert Storm, Lan-Cay turned to General Cutlery as a sub-contractor to provide near completed blades for assembly at the Lan-Cay facility. This sub-contract proved to be totally unworkable, and only about 300 General Cutlery made blades were ever passed by the Army inspectors and put into U.S. military service. The remainder of the General Cutlery blades were then demiled and destroyed as required by the Army.

All General Cutlery produced blades are easily identified as they are stamped on the ricasso "M9 / LANCAY / USA" in block letters of equal size. This form of marking was used only on the General Cutlery made blades and will not be used again. These General Cutlery made M9 bayonets were produced in a very limited number and are extremely rare as most were destroyed before issue. At least 300 examples, possibly more, were delivered to the Army and are now in collections and/or the supply system.

The second type marking after the General Cutlery blades were used up consisted of all capitol letters but in a different font size. The marking was as follows, "M9 / LANCAY / USA" with the "L" and "C" much larger then the other letters in the name. By this time Lan-Cay had purchased it’s own machinery and tooling for the production of blades and most of the work was done in house from this point in time. It is also noted that all the bayonets produced up to this point were left in the natural or "white" state on the blades. This was the required milspec finish. The coloring variation between the Lan-Cay produced blades and the original Phrobis contract blades is due to the finish process. Phrobis bead blasted the blades while Lan-Cay used a heavier sand blasting procedure. Thus the Lan-Cay blades appear a little darker, almost a light gray. This was soon to change as an "ECP" (Engineering Change Proposal) was supplied from Lan-Cay to Rock Island Arsenal for approval. Another change that took place during the first contract stage was a reduction in the depth of the fuller. Because of Bureaucracy, it is easier to make a change in a specification then to eliminate one. A classic end run was found to this problem. The fuller design was set at a depth of .06 with a plus or minus of .06 !! The .06 was 50% shallower then the previous design. In total 350 M9 bayonets were produced with the shallow fuller before the change to eliminate the fuller was agreed to. This was to prevent the blade breakage encountered in some of the earliest Phrobis products. Come to find out later that blade hardening and tempering was the culprit not the fuller. Anyway this makes the half fullered blade amongst the rarest to be encountered today. It was also at this time that Lan-Cay switched from forged blades to laser cut blades. The unfullered blades mark the change over period to this new production method.

A second contract was awarded to Lan-Cay on 9/1/94. This contract was for 104,111 Product Improved M9 bayonets. All the while that the first contract bayonets were being produced, Lan-Cay along with Rock Island Arsenal had been working on improvements to the M9 and the scabbard assembly. This second contract was to be the culmination of these efforts, the "Product Improved M9."

Although there had not been any reports of breakage of Lan-Cay produced blades the Army was still worried about the problem. To correct this potential problem several changes were approved. The first was to move the saw teeth further forward on the spine of the blade. Along with this the bottom of the teeth were rounded instead of the sharper "V" on earlier blades. Lan-Cay set their own broaching machine up to handle this with relative ease. Also the small "step" on the top of the blade just behind the saw teeth was eliminated for the simplification of manufacture. Another contract stipulation was to have the blades finished in a black oxide coating. A small number of M9 bayonets were still needed to finish off the first contract so the physical changes mentioned above minus the black oxide finish were used to complete the contract. Shipped on 4/21/95 were 1,090 Product Improved M9 bayonets with the sand blasted finish. These 1,090 blades make them some of the rarer bayonets for the collector to find. Again just another variation to add to the list. The second group of P.I. M9 bayonets with the full list of changes including the finish were delivered to the Army on 8/18/95 making this the first group of the second contract. Now comes the tricky part, during the second contract production the blade grinding was changed over from hollowing grinding to flat grinding to give the blade a stronger edge. Examples of both the flat grind and the hollow grind can be found with the standard for the time marking of "M9 / LANCAY / USA". At the time of the flat grind blade development the corporate name of LanCay was changed over to Lan-Cay with a hyphen. It was at this time that the blade markings were changed to the now familiar "M9 / LAN -CAY / USA". This we will call the third type marking. All blades produced from this point in time were so marked which includes the overwhelming majority of the second contract. Another change much later in the second contract was a move back to forging the blades.

Now for another twist, in early 1995 approximately 200 of the first style blades were placed aside in the factory as the blade tips were a fraction of an inch thinner then the specification called for. As the difference was extremely small, Lan-Cay submitted a Request for Variance to the Army to have these blades approved. Somehow the paperwork was misplaced and the variance was never approved. When the paperwork was finally found and the variance approved the first contract had ended. The second contract called for black oxide finish so a black finish was applied to these blades and they were included with the second contract. Early style first contract blades with the "M9 / LANCAY / USA" type marking, a second contract late style black finish and only two hundred made, the rarest of the production group so far.

Perhaps the rarest model produced by Lan-Cay were a group of hollow ground, black oxide finishes that had clear Lucite handles. These bayonets were used for test purposes to see the inner workings of the tang and to teach budding Army Armorer’s.

So as we can see, although they are new to the scene, the M9 bayonets are the beginning of a collectors dream. Many different variations with documented history behind them. It doesn’t get any better then that. The Lan-Cay second contract ended in the second week of April 1997 with all bayonets being furnished and accepted on time.

In September of 1999, a contract was offered for 25,000 M9 bayonets for the U.S. Army. Until this time Lan-Cay had been the only bidder on the M9 contracts since taking over production from Buck. In this bid however, Ontario Knife Company, a long time government provider in cutlery felt they could be competitive in the M9 bid as they had procured new laser cutting equipment. When the bidding was finalized the contract was split. Rock Island, the government entity that procures bayonets felt that by having a backup provider it would improve the overall competitiveness. So it came to pass that Lan-Cay would produce 12,500 bayonets and Ontario would produce 12,500 bayonets.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-29-2008, 12:20 AM
binoculord binoculord is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
Cool patent law

How did lan cay take over from buck and how could ontario bid if buck and phrobis had the various patents on the m9 knife and the scabard?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2008, 01:08 PM
lee cousens's Avatar
lee cousens lee cousens is offline
Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 70
How about the bayonets with the large U.S stamped on the ricasso?
P.s hi to all sorry i have been away for a while, but still trying to collect in the U.K!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2008, 04:34 PM
porterkids's Avatar
porterkids porterkids is offline
Super Moderator
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by binoculord
How did lan cay take over from buck and how could ontario bid if buck and phrobis had the various patents on the m9 knife and the scabard?
The US Army has the right to use the design and go out for competetive bid. When LanCay won their first contract they were not allowed to sell bayonets on the commercial market. I do not know what the term of the original Phrobis patent was, but I believe it must have expired.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2009, 03:45 AM
M9A1's Avatar
M9A1 M9A1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: BeiJing
Posts: 68
Good article
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:47 AM
Old-Smithy Old-Smithy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by lee cousens View Post
How about the bayonets with the large U.S stamped on the ricasso?
P.s hi to all sorry i have been away for a while, but still trying to collect in the U.K!!!

I have one of these as well, no makers mark at all. I was lead to believe it was Ontario, but is it?
__________________
Carl
www.old-smithy.info
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2009, 01:40 PM
porterkids's Avatar
porterkids porterkids is offline
Super Moderator
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 675
Not Ontario, Lan-Cay. They made a group of these and quietly released them on the commercial market. At the time they were still prohibited from selling the M9 commercially. They were made in OD, black and a small number of clear. I don't have my notes handy, but if I remember correctly the OD has versions with and without the sharpening stone while the black and clear were only made without the stone. The scabbards are marked with a large US just like the blades.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:16 PM
Old-Smithy Old-Smithy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by porterkids View Post
Not Ontario, Lan-Cay. They made a group of these and quietly released them on the commercial market. At the time they were still prohibited from selling the M9 commercially. They were made in OD, black and a small number of clear. I don't have my notes handy, but if I remember correctly the OD has versions with and without the sharpening stone while the black and clear were only made without the stone. The scabbards are marked with a large US just like the blades.

Many thanks, so another one to re lable, but possibly one that one day will be worth something as they are obviously not the most common ones out there. Many thanks Bill
__________________
Carl
www.old-smithy.info
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
History of the M9 Part I: Phrobis and Buck M9 Bayonets Quarterbore General M9 Bayonet Topics 7 06-28-2011 02:12 PM
Ontario Knife Works: USMC MARINE CORPS OKC3S bayonet Quarterbore Ontario Knife Works M9 Bayonet 10 07-17-2006 06:07 PM
History of the Buckmaster, Buckmaster Lite, Titanium, and M9 Quarterbore Buck-184 Buckmaster Forum 2 03-23-2005 09:38 PM
History of the Buckmaster, Buckmaster Lite, Titanium, and M9 Quarterbore Buck Buckmaster Forum 0 12-13-2004 08:01 PM
Looking for Help and Info... Ontario M9 Bayonet History!!! Quarterbore General M9 Bayonet Topics 0 12-13-2004 07:15 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.