Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Ammo and Reloading
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 03-20-2011, 06:04 PM
snipecatcher snipecatcher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 177
Super/Subsonic experiment

I wanted to know whether the sound of the rifle or the sound of the bullet striking would be louder, and just how loud the muzzle blast is from a distance. I had my brother shoot (1) each of a subsonic 208 A-max, and a supersonic 150 Sierra Pro-hunter within a few feet of me and into a tree. Yes, I know some will say "You had him shoot at you!" BUT I was behind a 3.5' thick pecan tree and only one round was loaded at a time. I was completely protected behind the tree. This test was conducted with my 10" 300 BLK w/ 308 suppressor.




RESULTS:
With the subsonics, I could clearly hear the sound of the shot, and it was louder than the sound of the bullet striking the tree 40 yards in front of me. It was obvious where the shooter was.
With supersonics, my right ear was ringing and that's about all I knew.

The sound of the supersonic crack is greater than the sound of:
A. the rifle
B. the bullet impact

I can now see why people say that sometimes a group of pigs will run TOWARDS them when they shoot. If I did not know where the shooter was, I would have assumed the shot came from my right because that's where the ear ringing sound came from. Despite being louder, supersonics may be better overall for hunting. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.