Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > Title 1 Weapons Forums > AK-47 Topics
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 03-07-2007, 10:53 PM
Orion Orion is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
I figured that construction of the MG would fall more under NFA gunsmithing/manufacturing.

With what I do I don't have need of an entity as of yet but most likely will in the future so I may have to go down that path anyway and the ownership of the MG's without CLEO's signatures is a surprise bonus.

I think that any type of corporate entity, be it S, C or LLC would be preferrable to the Trust unless you got a trustee that was trusworthy. There is something about having someone hold your assets in their name and have power over them that makes me nervous. But I wonder if you could be the trustee and name the beneficiaries as ones children. You have a valid point about the transfer to your children though, the corp has a distinct advantage there.

How come you chose a C corp instead of an S corp? Is there any benefit to you to justify the double taxation?

Did those people you know who used a trust have a lawyer prepare the trust docs and who did they use as trustee?
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.