|
11-05-2011, 11:53 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 113
|
|
Probably true, but I wanted a quality upper that was ready to go. Shooting 25 round 1 MOA groups (side to side, not center to center) with supersonic ammo at 100y meets that desire. I just need to find a combination of buffer/spring/bufer tube that will work correctly. The evening I recieved the Noveske upper, I took it to the NRA HQ range sitting on top of my service rifle rock river lower with a rifle length buffer tube/spring/buffer combo. With 225 Hornadys over 10.6 grains of 1680, it cycled fine. When I put it on a brand new Rock River carbine lower and tried the same loads, it didn't work. (a little fact I didn't realize until a few days ago while trying to figure out what was going on).
After talking to Noveske this week, I went back to check the buffer tubes and springs in each of my 300 WTF;s and found that the new pistol and carbine lowers I bought have thicker, 2 coil longer springs that take more pressure to compress than the Colt lowers I have. They also have a rougher interior to the buffer tube than the Colts and the RRA Service rifle lower that I have logged thousdands of rounds in. Consequently, I ordered 2 DPMS springs, a Cot H and H2 buffer and a Tubb BCG weight addition. Between all those and what I have, I should be able to find a winning combo.
BTW: I just got back from the range where I shot the Noveske upper with 240 SMK's over 10.7 grains of 1680. It cycled fine and put all 10 proof rounds into .45" at 50 yards. That tells me it's on the border of resolution.
As for the pistol upper, I've got some more test rounds loaded with 1680, N110, and RE7. Once the new springs come in on Tuesday, I'll run through all the combinations until I find a winner. I've gotten great accuracy from this little barrel, I just need to marry it up to the right lower. I'll also take a Colt and DPMS carbine lower as well to see it that makes a difference (quality of buffer tubes).
|
11-06-2011, 11:01 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 95
|
|
Sounds like your getn close. Good luck!
|
11-06-2011, 03:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 31
|
|
Rumlover, or should I say fellow rum lover, I'm especially interested in your 8" results. Mine's a Shilen, very narrow lands.... your loads may not directly translate.
Last edited by Ned christiansen; 11-06-2011 at 03:17 PM.
|
11-06-2011, 07:14 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 113
|
|
OK Gents...I couldn't take waiting for the additional springs and buffer to come in on Tuesday and I really wanted to get my oldest behind his deer rifle before our big hunting trip next weekend. So here's what I tried today:
For the 8":
I loaded up some 1680, 10.2 grains w/ Hornady 225 Match, and changed out the buffer to a 6.3oz heavy buffer and a lighter weight Colt carbine spring. This was all inside a Rock River pistol lower with their 2 stage match trigger.
10 shot average velocity was 962 with only a standard deviation of 6. All rounds ejected and cycled. I got a little blowback (already using a PRI handle) and increased ejection port noise (less than with the H buffer and Colt spring--cycles hard; more than the Rock River heavy weight spring with the 6.3oz buffer--cycles very soft). When I switched over to a lighter buffer (H) with heavier buffer spring, the same round would eject, but wouldn't completely strip the next round. I still got some crap in the face, but it was less than the previous combination. Ejection port noise was a little less.
Then I tried N110, 8.9 grains w/ Hornady 225's, and the H bufffer with the lighter Colt carbine spring. Average velocity was 1063. None of the rounds fully ejected and it didn't cycle, BUT....the ejection port noise was a lot less with less blowback.
The way ahead....I see a few options here. First, I can find a slightly faster powder than 1680 that still generates a lot of gas. Secondly, I'll try adding the BCG weights to increase the moment of inertia and lock time while using a lighter spring and H buffer. Third, install a better buffer tube. I can feel machining marks inside the Rock River and the guys at Noveske specifically mentioned that issue causing greater friction and malfunctions. Lastly, I can pull off the gas block and install an adjustable block.
NOW FOR THE NOVESKE...
I loaded up the following loads, all with hornady 225's.
10.6 grains, 1092 fps 10 shot average, great accuracy, all cycled
10.5 grains, 1103 fps 10 shot average (better burn rate maybe??), great accuracy and all cycled
10.2 grains, 1066 fps 10 shot average, great accuracy--1 MOA side to side--ALL CYCLED
Then I switched over to 240 SMKs with 10.6 grains of 1680. 1043 fps 10 shot average. All cycled and ejected and it sounded sweet...even sweeter when I saw the 3/4" group in the spotting scope.
These were shot with the same RRA H buffer and carbine spring as last week...WTH! I'm not sure what made the difference. Since my last trip to the range, I scrubbed the whole thing with Kroil and made sure to calibrate the RCBS charge master before changing each load. Perhaps it just needed a good breaking in.
More to come...
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.
|