Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Rifles and Pistols
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2010, 09:38 AM
rsilvers rsilvers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 482
Longer barrels 300 AAC BLACKOUT

So this is kind of interesting. Even I was wondering what happens when the barrel gets to 20 inches. Some have said 300 AAC BLACKOUT would not be so good from longer barrels, but that is not the case.

http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=65866

I noticed that the very smokin' hot Hornady 75 NATO Superformance load is 75 grains at 2909 fps from a 20 inch barrel. That is 1409 ft-lbs.

With Remington 155 ammo I got 2100 fps average 10 shots in the 20 inch barrel. That is 1518 ft-lbs.

So in a 20 inch, 6.8 will beat 300 AAC BLACKOUT for energy, but it still exceeds the very latest and hottest 75 grain load in 5.56mm NATO.

This is for a 110 grain bullet:



My take is that barrels up to 20 inches make sense for general use, and longer barrels make sense for more limited use.
__________________
R&D for AAC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2010, 11:56 AM
i8asquirrel i8asquirrel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: oregon
Posts: 198
That is good info, I however am looking for mainly subsonic use...In my case longer than 16" make no difference except adding weight..I think that somebody looking for a low recoiling rifle for new deer hunters would be well served with a 18 or 20" rifle in this calliber!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.