Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Rifles and Pistols
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2008, 11:55 AM
Medic650 Medic650 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellis, Ks
Posts: 50
Bolt action, Remington, Savage, or CZ

I want to build a 300 Whisper bolt gun. Originally I was going to go with a Remington 700 but am concerned with the ejection problems with the Remington.
I've never shot a Savage but have they seem to have a good rep. and always heard good things about the accu-trigger. It looks like it's easy to swap the barrel on the Savage. Anything special to so for headspace? Any extraction or feeding problems like the Remington.
I don't know anyone with the CZ but, I like the Mauser type bolt on the CZ. It looks like the CZ shouldn't have any feeding or extraction problems. In a CZ I would look at the 527.

For the more experianced, which would make the best build?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2008, 12:05 PM
Spook's Avatar
Spook Spook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 499
Medic, I have been made aware of some feeding issues with the CZ... may be remedied by a 7.62 X 39 magazine as a fix.
Rems..Savages either eject or dont and its been an individual rifle sort of thing...Some work with a little "technique" while working the bolt.
Howa seems to work best for me thus far.

Others mileage will likely vary.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2008, 12:54 PM
egraham egraham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 64
I have a remington 700 and it shoots through the same hole at 100 yards with subsonics. Sometimes the bolt drops the brass but if I had to do it again I would go with the 700.

No feeding problems and there are plenty of aftermarkets parts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2008, 03:15 PM
Medic650 Medic650 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellis, Ks
Posts: 50
I'm not really familier with Howa. I don't have a particular brand in mind but, I don't want to shell out for a custom and have it not function without problems.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:35 PM
Malaga's Avatar
Malaga Malaga is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 72
Look to the CZ.. all in all a better platform from which to build. Mag issue is a simple fix.. on the 527 223 mags you will need to remove a little metal from the sides to allow smooth function.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2008, 07:06 PM
Fastshooter03's Avatar
Fastshooter03 Fastshooter03 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 49
You might consider a Tikka as well. My M595 works great except for a longer than needed bolt travel.
I don't have a T3 but I would think that would work?

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2008, 03:08 PM
amafrank's Avatar
amafrank amafrank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 197
I'd go with the CZ myself ( and I do have one in the works). I really like the extractor and the single set trigger which is fantastic. The mag problem seems to be a very small thing which can be fixed easily.

I've done a 700 and there are issues with extraction and ejecting that could cause problems if you actually need a quick followup shot. Most of us shooting paper have never really needed that followup since the paper rarely shoots back....I do like the 700's other than that one minor detail.

I've built a number of Remington 799's which are the mini Mark X mauser actions from Zastava / Serbia. They are small handy rifles and work quite well and my only complaint with them is that they use the small Sako type extractor which can slip off a sticky case rim when you are working up a load. Other than that they are my second choice as accuracy is good and they are smaller and lighter than the 700's. Actions and rifles in 223 seem to have disappeared however and I'm not sure if remington is still importing them.

That leads us back to the CZ. The actions are basically the Mauser 98 action which has proven to be accurate. The CZ's are smaller versions but still use the non rotating extractor which is really nice. It holds a much larger percentage of the rim than the Sako types or the remington type so the pull is better meaning less torn rims and stuck cases. The quality is excellent and the wood is quite beautiful on all the rifles I've seen. It appears that the action wrench I adapted for the Zastava 799 will work on the CZ as well so working on the actions is simple. As one of the others noted the mag lips can be bent or ground slightly to allow better feeding of the 300 round so that problem can be easily solved. The CZ is smaller, lighter and a bit handier than the 700 and to me thats an advantage. The set trigger can be used or not used at the shooters discretion and mine broke at 2lb 14oz unset or 12 oz set. Its easy to shoot on a rest with the trigger set and not disturb the rifle.

Thats my opinion for what its worth. Good luck on your build

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2008, 05:02 PM
Medic650 Medic650 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ellis, Ks
Posts: 50
Thanks Frank, I was leaning towards the CZ already. I had at one time considered a Ruger to get the positive extraction but haven't been able to find anyone that has built on a Ruger.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-03-2009, 06:16 PM
Cerebus Cerebus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 16
Is barrel installation a DIY project on a CZ rifle? ...or does a smith need to be involved?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2009, 12:58 PM
Malaga's Avatar
Malaga Malaga is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 72
On the CZ I would definatly recommend a good smith as the barrel is both screwed and glued in place.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.