"another" .300 blk not good for hunting

[rsilvers]

This guy is using WTF to mean BLK specifically:

http://68forums.com/forums/showthrea...553#post267553

"The Wisper has a shorter lead and is more accurate than the 300 WTF so I would keep the Wisper chamber."

[pud-knocker]

And this guy wrote "cry me a river"


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Timberlake

[sha-ul]

Originally Posted by rsilvers

This guy is using WTF to mean BLK specifically:

http://68forums.com/forums/showthrea...553#post267553

"The Wisper has a shorter lead and is more accurate than the 300 WTF so I would keep the Wisper chamber."

see a post like that automatically gets processed by my internal bs filter(maybe it's because I read it too fast ) I wouldn't get too worked up over it.

here's something to think about, Is it possible to make a gauge of some sort that would act as a go/no-go for an older chamber? For example, many older chambers you had to turn the necks if you trimmed 223 brass, but were ok with 221 brass expanded, My Shilen blank was made with a 300/221 no-turn chamber. So I don't have that issue, but there is still the lead issue.
But if the tool would only slip onto a safe chamber with light finger pressure, but would not seat on too short of a lead. Maybe a 2 piece, outer chamber gauge to measure neck& shoulder, with a plunger for the throat portion.

[Alleycat]

[QUOTE=rsilvers;35312]This guy is using WTF to mean BLK specifically:

http://68forums.com/forums/showthrea...553#post267553

"The Wisper has a shorter lead and is more accurate than the 300 WTF so I would keep the Wisper chamber."[/QUOTE]

This is wrong.


Everybody knows the 6.5 is a superior caliber when compared to the 6.8.

[rsilvers]

He warns people to not buy any 6.8 SAAMI rifle because the throat is shorter than the 6.8 SPC-II - and it is recommended to have the longer throat to shoot all types of ammo - and yet then he tells someone to not get a BLK chamber - even though having one allows one to ensure you are in spec to shoot BLK ammo.

If the concept applies to 300 BLK, it would also apply to 6.8 SPC-II. But pointing that out makes their heads explode.

[rsilvers]

Originally Posted by Alleycat

Everybody knows the 6.5 is a superior caliber when compared to the 6.8.

Hard to say. I think one has to factor in magazine and bolt reliability.

[justshoot]

Originally Posted by gds

Man I just wanted to show another deer I killed with my .300 blk. With a jab at naysayers of the concept, not start a pissing match with those that support the concept of the .300 blk.

-

That's all I was was trying to do also, was to just flip you some goodhearted shit about shooting a runt with your underpowered BLK .
Then this Thread went down Tits'up to the WTF Cal. .. I been LMAO with reading this tonight . It is still a good Thread .
You guys are really busting rsilvers Balls too . &' I understand ' reading & seeing all the the BLK shot show, YouTube hype, Product push/marketing w/the SAAMI spec. It's like he never gave any legitimacy/respect to .300/221 Rem. & all Life begins @ the BLK .

He does grandstand promote the shit out of 300 Blackout & say ..." it's the best thing since sliced bread ". 'BUT' I got to commend rsilvers for the going the extra mile & help take the 300/221 Rem. to the mainstream SAAMI . for a fact it does make 300/221 more legitimate . It can Not hurt anything & only make shooting a 300 WTF even better .
Look @ all the good factory ammo out there if you are Not Hand-loading @ a reasonable price helping people wanting to get started shooting the WTF or BLK . & Also it moves the 30-221 right in the backdoor for anyone working a Trade armed that is mandated to Only Use a factory build w/factory Ammo .

.300 AAC Blackout, It's Not just the Bastard Brother of 300/221 Rem./300 Whisper
SAAMI Spec. 300 BLK . ( imho ) ... IT'S ABOUT FUCKING TIME !
.

[ds762]

Originally Posted by rsilvers

Why do you guys call 300 BLK 300 WTF? The final SAAMI standard is established and has arrived. The final name is known. It is 300 AAC Blackout.

Why might you ask? Simple .. your company politics and policies have left a bad taste in my mouth. I'll spend more money NOT to have a product with reference to AAC's theft of JD Jones's work.

I appreciate the fact that SAAMI standards will in the end benefit me as more companies will make products for a caliber I've been enjoying for a long time. But it doesn't mean I have to embrace your company with warm fuzzy hugs and start exchanging Christmas cards either!

Do I own an SSK product? NO. Would I own an AAC product? Hell no!