Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Ammo and Reloading
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2011, 05:38 PM
thehouseproduct's Avatar
thehouseproduct thehouseproduct is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 103
Would anyone be up for trying this idea?

It'd be fun to try something like this. It might work OK in a whisper. They had trouble with these when they went super sonic.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2011, 06:43 PM
i8asquirrel i8asquirrel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: oregon
Posts: 198
I remember something close to that in the 80's a grenade type called R.A.G
Ring airfoil Grenade. was alot flatter shooting than M203 but never caught on..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-06-2011, 01:07 PM
Hoser Hoser is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 342
I would be concerned that the base might come off in a brake or a can.

Other than that, cool idea.
__________________
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
I load and shoot the brass I make
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-06-2011, 07:27 PM
LouBoyd LouBoyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Patagonia Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 231
One company that might be willing to make some of them is Lehigh Bullets. They have the machinery and it doesn't require making special bullet moulds, Just programming them into their CNC lathes.

David Fricke (Dave) is the proprietor of Lehigh bullets. I briefly discussed a bullet similar to this with him a few of years ago. Some of the problems are to make the plug strong enough to hold the chamber pressure without blowby and still allow it to drop away freely when the base pressure drops off. I think an aluminum sphere in the base might be suitable. The bullet still needs to engrave in the rifling. Most Lehigh bullets have engraving grooves on the shank, probably desirable for most applications. The copper alloys Dave uses should be suitable. Some of his bullet designs are pretty close to this already, though the central hole doesn't go completely though.



the advantages I can see in this bullet are to provide stability from high(er) rotational inertia to frontal area ratio and provide "base bleed" to reduce drag, The bullet should behave like a hollow point for terminal ballistics. There would still be some experimenting to do to get a design which flies well. If I was going to try it, it would be for a cartridge which uses large bore bullets and has limited magazine space like the 458 Socom or 50 Beowulf.

The downside of a "though hole" bullet is it's throwing away mass by drilling the hole. Energy is 1/2 M* V^2 . Velocity is locked at under 1000 fps for subsonics. The only way to deliver more energy is with more Mass. For supersonics it's all about getting maximum mass at maxiumum velocity with minimum drag. Minimum drag is what separates long range bullets from short range ones, and it also helps wind deflection.

While these designs look promising to squeeze more downrange energy out of an existing cartridge with a fixed diameter, twist rate, and bullet length, I'm of the opinion after studying them some that you'll always be better off as far as energy delivered at long range with a longer, thinner, and heavier projectile. The US military seems to agree. Look at the projectiles used in the Abrams tank. Also the projectiles used in the CheyTac and similar long rage rifles.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2011, 12:24 AM
sha-ul sha-ul is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 281
There was an article about these tubular bullets on the America rifleman, Feb 2011

But you think about it, there is 2X the surface area for air friction, plus you also have more of a surface on the nose for cross winds to get a hold on& push off course.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2011, 12:17 PM
HUNTER2 HUNTER2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 231
Tried this a few years back. Acc. will degrade real fast. Terminal preformance is just so-so. But newer materials and cnc might change things. Good luck...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.