Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Rifles and Pistols
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-13-2005, 12:56 PM
John3 John3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 14
We did a group buy of 4 SSK uppers and suppressors, through a local Class III dealer. The MSRP price for the upper is $1,100, and the suppressor $635 (extra $35 for the Black finish). The discount my dealer got for this order was very small, maybe 20%. It was about enough to cover his paperwork time, shipping and sales tax, and we paid him the SSK MSRP as a net delivered price (including the local 8.25% sales tax). The dealer might have made $50 or $100 on each set, but that's fine with me, since I want to keep him happy, too. Not many of those guys around.

My thinking on paying the big bucks for the SSK upper was simply to avoid problems and save time getting it up and running. I don't mind paying more for someone else's trial & error to determine the correct gas port size and placement, feed ramp configuration, etc.

I also wanted a minimum length suppressed upper for my M16, so that implied the 10" barrel with 5" of the 12" suppressor overlapping the barrel, for a net suppressed barrel length of 17" or so. This is because the 300 Whisper in sub-sonic reaches its optimal velocity at 10" or so, and any extra barrel length is not only wasted, but detrimental to accuracy, because of the slow bullet taking extra time in the longer barrel. I am restricted to using the upper on my M16 lower (or I could have registered a lower as an SBR). I don't mind the extra SSK suppressor weight, since I will use this for full auto fire, and my experience with suppressors is that size = quietness, and weight = robustness.

Also, hopefully, JD Jones will stand behind the product and fix any problems. He has personally answered every one of my email questions, although sometimes a bit tersely. So far, he and his people have been reasonably responsive, although it is amazing to me that they don't take the time to post a FAQ with the top twenty or so Whisper questions on their web site. I must have been the 100th person to call and ask "how much for Black finish", "how much does the suppressor overlap the barrel",or, "what alternatives work for rail tubes", for example.

In fact, I will post the info I got from them. Might save someone else some time and hassle.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-13-2005, 01:47 PM
Cornholio Cornholio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by John3
I also wanted a minimum length suppressed upper for my M16, so that implied the 10" barrel with 5" of the 12" suppressor overlapping the barrel, for a net suppressed barrel length of 17" or so. This is because the 300 Whisper in sub-sonic reaches its max velocity at 10" or so, and any extra barrel length is not only wasted, but detrimental to accuracy, because of the slow bullet dwell time in the longer barrel.
I hope this isn't true. I commissioned a rebarrel job on my Rem 700 to Whisper with a 1 in 8" Douglas with a barrel length of 22" past the recoil lug.

I have a small .30 cal suppressor which seems to work best with lower pressure gas. So rather than use a short barrel (which would probably work well with a large volume suppressor that telescopes over the barrel), I figured on using a longer barrel to lessen the gas pressure hitting the suppressor. I'm willing to deal with the added weight and bulk if it means quieter performance. But I'm not sure if I'm willing to accept diminished accuracy/precision...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-13-2005, 02:16 PM
John3 John3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 14
JD Jones told me there is no difference in accuracy, velocity or reliabilty in 300 Whisper Corbon 220gr sub-sonic between 10" and 16" barrels, and that the velocity is about 40 fps higher in 14” barrel. I guess this implies that 14" is the end of the powder burning cycle, and that the round starts to slow back down due to barrel friction after that. He also stated that bullet T-I-B (Time-In-Barrel) was not an issue with any barrel length for 300 Whisper in AR15 uppers, but that T-I-B is an issue with all .510 Whispers and with .338 and .300 in light rifles (i.e. Contender). These must be "very firmly and consistently gripped" to repeat POI.

No mention of any suppressor considerations. He did state that there are 2 schools of suppressor theory: Low Pressure/High Volume and High Pressure/Low Volume, and that the LP/HV design works best for the Whispers.

In spite of JD's claim ("T-I-B is not an issue for any length AR15 barrel"), I know from personal experience that slow bullets are very sensitive to any slight barrel movement during firing, including any recoil-induced movement. You may not see this effect from a solid bench rest, but holding off-hand, sitting, leaning against a tree, etc. will cause the POI to change in seemingly random ways. This has been consistently my experience with slow pistol calibers (357 Mag, 44 Mag, 45 Colt) and sub-sonic .308 rounds in 16" or longer rifle length barrels. Because of this, I opted for the shortest possible barrel (10").
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-14-2005, 12:42 AM
Artful's Avatar
Artful Artful is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 228
[QUOTE=John3]JD Jones told me there is no difference in accuracy, velocity or reliabilty in 300 Whisper Corbon 220gr sub-sonic between 10" and 16" barrels, and that the velocity is about 40 fps higher in 14” barrel.
In spite of JD's claim ("T-I-B is not an issue for any length AR15 barrel"), I know from personal experience that slow bullets are very sensitive to any slight barrel movement during firing, including any recoil-induced movement./QUOTE]

I'll second that from experiance with pistol shooting - follow through is very important with slower velocity firearms (pistol, muzzle loaders etc).

While tha crosshair settled on target and the cartridge was setoff and the gun is in recoil on a 22-250 or .223 the bullet is out the barrel on slower guns it's still in the barrel and if you don't hold it on target (follow through) you'll have lots of near misses (some not so near! )

For myself I'll go the 16" to say the paperwork and expense :p

Anxiously awaiting shoot comparison with you fellow Whisper shooters.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-15-2005, 12:22 AM
Cornholio Cornholio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 108
I figured that with a long, heavy barrel and the super-light recoil of a subsonic Whisper, especially with a suppressor, that there wouldn't be much recoil-induced movement.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-05-2005, 01:23 AM
Artful's Avatar
Artful Artful is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by John3
3 of my buddies bought Whisper uppers with me, and we will mix/match try them out this weekend, including super-sonic ammo, hopefully.
John did you ever get together and see if it's your upper or something else?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-05-2005, 02:20 AM
John3 John3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 14
I only got to test one other upper from our order, and it was shooting 4"+ groups, too. I sent mine back to SSK on August 22nd, and am waiting for resolution. I'll post here when resolved.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-28-2005, 02:17 PM
John3 John3 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dripping Springs, TX
Posts: 14
My SSK .300 Whisper 10" bbl upper is now shooting <1.5" groups consistently at 100 yards, with Corbon 220 gr. factory ammo, and the SSK suppressor installed. SSK replaced the barrel, but it still wasn't shooting well without the suppressor.

Here's what I learned:


1. I get 4-8" groups without the SSK suppressor, off a benchrest. I'm thinking there is some kind of perturbation going on with the gas system, when the heavy suppressor is not there to calm things down.

2. I get better groups (3"?) without the suppressor with the gas turned off, but they are not consistent.

3. It takes about 30 shots to "condition" my clean barrel for best accuracy. Why? No idea, but JD Jones insists this is necessary, and it works. I now just leave my upper dirty, although I don't feel good about it. Thank goodness the barrel is stainless.

4. This combo (Corbon sub-sonic with suppressor) is all I really care about anyway, so I am pretty happy.

5. Except . . . now that I have the damn thing shooting right, no one has the Corbon ammo for sale. This gun has become the most popular one with my guests for mid-day plinking at the deer camp. It is a real kick, and very quiet, but a case of ammo doesn't last very long, especially with full auto bursts.

Next step is to get back to my Leupold SPR scope tests, now that I have this baby up and running right. I'll do this as soon as I can find some more ammo, and post results under the "Which Scope is Best?" topic. So far, it is dead on at the 100 and 200 yard aiming points, but I haven't tried the 300 and 400 yard aiming points yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.