Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > Knife Forums > LanCay M9 Bayonets
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-27-2009, 06:34 AM
Carlo's Avatar
Carlo Carlo is offline
Senior Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by porterkids View Post
That's because there would be no difference between it and a "legitimate" one.
Exactly!
Anyway, I will not bid on this clear example only because I'm more Phrobis/Buck "oriented".
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-27-2009, 09:36 AM
Mister Moon's Avatar
Mister Moon Mister Moon is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 434
... Sure Carlo .... u will not put bid on it


Last edited by Mister Moon; 05-27-2009 at 10:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-27-2009, 10:17 AM
pwcosol pwcosol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 161
Just checked my clear first variation (LanCay). Fastex clip is dated 3/95. Because the MPBS is a modular system, it works as an advantage for either maintenance or upgrading the design during it's service life. However, this may or may not be beneficial for we collectors. Nearly any combination of parts can be assembled into a complete M9. A fair number of such bayonets (Lancay variants in particular) have appeared on the market in the past 15 years or so. If some of the scarcer Lancay military production M9s originated only from those produced & delivered to the Army, and not from over-runs or assembled from left-over parts procured from Lancay, I assure you there would be far fewer examples of these in collector hands!
In the book "American Gladius", Capt. Pattarozzi concentrates only on those known M9 variants as produced by Phrobis/Buck, Lancay, & Ontario delivered to the military. He discusses the difficulty in obtaining bonafide "issue" M9s as opposed to those sold commercially. This is why a provenance is of great help when acquiring any M9. The bottom line is any of us may have one or more M9 bayonet variations which are identical to a pattern produced for the US military, but were assembled after the fact. However, it may be impossible to establish this for certain. Therefore, so long as the bayonet conforms to the correct pattern it can be considered a legitimate example until proven otherwise.

Last edited by pwcosol; 05-27-2009 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-27-2009, 02:17 PM
porterkids's Avatar
porterkids porterkids is offline
Super Moderator
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 675
Well put Fred. That's basically what I was thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-03-2009, 08:11 AM
Mister Moon's Avatar
Mister Moon Mister Moon is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 434
Again ... One CLEAR 2nd Model ...


http://cgi.ebay.com/Lan-Cay-Lucite-h...3A1%7C294%3A50
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-12-2009, 10:34 PM
Mister Moon's Avatar
Mister Moon Mister Moon is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 434
... Today, one M9 CLEAR second VERSION Lan-Cay was sold for approximately 600 $ unfortunately, it seems that parts were not in accordance.. The 3 versions have no marking on the latching mechanism... Here is the photo that the salesman sent to me
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Latching Mechanism BAD for clearM9.JPG
Views:	148
Size:	91.9 KB
ID:	677  
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-12-2009, 10:47 PM
Mister Moon's Avatar
Mister Moon Mister Moon is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 434
... here the correct " parts " NO-MARKING "
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	LATCHINGgoodMECHANISM3versionsCLEARm9 004.jpg
Views:	134
Size:	164.8 KB
ID:	678  
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-13-2009, 12:55 PM
Carlo's Avatar
Carlo Carlo is offline
Senior Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 487
Good observation Fabrizio!
As a side note: would you agree with me saying that in the case of the General Cutlery LanCay the most desiderable part of the bayonet is actually the blade, while on the clear Lan(-)Cay it is the plastic scabbard and handle?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-13-2009, 01:28 PM
Mister Moon's Avatar
Mister Moon Mister Moon is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carlo View Post
Good observation Fabrizio!
As a side note: would you agree with me saying that in the case of the General Cutlery LanCay the most desiderable part of the bayonet is actually the blade, while on the clear Lan(-)Cay it is the plastic scabbard and handle?

... yes. I beleive that u're right ... same for the GEN CUT .... the blade seem more important that absolutely nothing........... Other great example was the XM9 from Rex'y around 300 $ perhaps without the handle but : it was an X M 9 !

.. My opinion about the CLEAR is : 600 $ for the scabbard & the handle : was a good deal ... As we know, under 100 units made for the clear 2nd version.

Amen
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.