Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > National Firearms Act Weapons > Short Barreled Rifles
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2006, 10:44 AM
ShuckersFan's Avatar
ShuckersFan ShuckersFan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Murphy, TX
Posts: 25
SBR Question

I'm thinking of getting a Sten parts kit and a Zastava M92 parts kit. Both of which I believe are considered SBR's when completed. The parts kits themselves are not though... Is the a correct assumption?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2006, 11:34 AM
Quarterbore's Avatar
Quarterbore Quarterbore is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 1,598
What you ask is subject of heated arguments on other forums but in general the BATFE has said that if you have all the parts needed to build a SBR that you could be prosecuted for intent to build a SBR.

With that said, the T/C case shows that it is perfectly legal for a person to build a pistol and then later convert it to a rifle and then back to a pistol.

Furthermore, until a virgin receiver is first built it is neither a pistol or a rifle.

So, if you can argue that you planned to build the kit as a pistol and that if you were not happy with the performace of the pistol as a pistol you were leaving the option open for either paying your taxes and makinga legal SBR or perhaps you wild silver solder a barrel extension to the barrel to make a legal non-NFA rifle...

In that condition, as long as you NEVER BUILD an illegal SBR I would personally find it hard to believe that the BATFE could win a case in a court of law for constructibve intent.

I have a Sten kit as well as a pair of Krink kits and even one AMD-65 kit still... I doubt I will ever build the Sten but the Krinks and the AMD-65 I do want to SBR but I just don't have the $600 to do so now. I am not about to sell my stock or other parts off but if the laws wuld change and I can not get a SBR for some reason then I still have the option to build a legal pistol or a legal rifle.

Like I said on the start, some people will advise that the short barrel with all the parts needed to build a SBR could get you into trouble with the BATFE and I sure am no lawyer so you do need to understand there are some risks. Oh and for what it is worth, I do have an AMD-65 pistol and it is a lot of fun to shoot!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2006, 11:22 AM
ShuckersFan's Avatar
ShuckersFan ShuckersFan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Murphy, TX
Posts: 25
Thanks QB! I'm going to fill out the paper work for an SBR Krink. Since it doesn't have a S/N, no receiver no S/N, do I use the serial off the trunnion and then use the same number to stamp the receiver after it is made? I think I read that somewhere...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-30-2006, 12:14 PM
Quarterbore's Avatar
Quarterbore Quarterbore is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valley Forge, PA
Posts: 1,598
You don't have to do it that way but it sure is the way I would do it!

Also, if paying your taxes I would consider spending the $60 or a little more for a Global receiver plus the fees they charge for a custom serial number... Unless, you like how your flats or blanks come out...

I like my builds from Flats but the 100% receiver builds do look a little better.

Good Luck and sounds like fun!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.