Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Rifles and Pistols
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:06 PM
Rattler347 Rattler347 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Clarification on "Inventor" of the 300 "Whisper"

Just as a clarification; JD Jones did not "invent" the 300 Whisper as the opening article to this site so boldly states.

The cartridge, under a plethora of other names most commonly called 300 Fireball, had been in use for many years prior to JD Jones capitalizing on the name "Whisper" which is of course is his derivative and 'used in commerce' name (although a search of the TESS Trademark database shows no sign when you search for 300 Whisper. That is not to say something else is not registered, but under those guidelines allowable, "300 Whisper" shows no sign, live or dead) of that chambering, but he was rather late in joining many others already offering such a cambering in a number of firearms including the AR15.

This has once again, come up as a topic of conversation with the latest iteration by Mr. Silvers and Remington as the 300 Blackout, simply another variation on a theme.

Bottom line, it is an excellent little round, and I wish Remington all the luck in further mainstreaming what the shooting world has known and loved for over 20 years.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-05-2011, 06:30 PM
Alleycat's Avatar
Alleycat Alleycat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Columbia, TN
Posts: 364
Okey dokey


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2011, 06:42 PM
Titleiiredneck Titleiiredneck is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 329
__________________
www.1050fps.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-05-2011, 07:23 PM
rsilvers rsilvers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 482
Agreed it is wrong to use his trademarked name without a license - that is true both morally and legally. It would be like calling generic cotton swabs Q-Tips(R) or random facial tissue Kleenex(R). One should not do it. Beyond that, people just want what is best.
__________________
R&D for AAC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2011, 11:46 PM
i8asquirrel i8asquirrel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: oregon
Posts: 198
Well I for one don't care what you want to call it. I have never had a rifle that was less expensive to reload for or more accurate! I love the cartridge and and have it in a semi and a bolt gun,and plan on buildin a AR pistol in the same calliber.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-2011, 08:09 AM
martineta martineta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 101
well said Rsilvers

Well said. Oh I love shooting on the cheap also.. Cheapest, fun, and accurate to 150 yds or so. Can not beat a 22 hornet. Not supposed to deer hunt with a hornet but I hear a head shot drops em pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2011, 09:17 AM
Spook's Avatar
Spook Spook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 499
OK so who actually concepted it if JDJ didnt?
Was the intent to shoot subsonic loads?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.