Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Rifles and Pistols
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2011, 11:45 PM
ilike2hunt2 ilike2hunt2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1
Help me decide, or decide for me!

I'm a noob (first day here), and I have only one question. But before I get to it I will tell ya'll this. I have been all over the internet for 2 days and have looked at the Whisper info and Blackout info. I'm converting an AR over to one of these rounds but I can't decide which one to get.

QUESTION: Do I get a Whiper or Black out????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2011, 11:51 PM
sha-ul sha-ul is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 281
I would say go ahead for the blk, that way you can use factory loaded ammo, but can still handload if you wish
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2011, 08:44 AM
ds762 ds762 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MO
Posts: 98
the same reamer I got from PTG that said 300-221 now says 300 AAC Blackout (with the original 300/221 markings defaced).

Its the same reamer so which one do you want your gunsmith to call it??
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2011, 09:00 AM
rsilvers rsilvers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by ds762 View Post
the same reamer I got from PTG that said 300-221 now says 300 AAC Blackout (with the original 300/221 markings defaced).

Its the same reamer so which one do you want your gunsmith to call it??
The chambers are not the same, it is like comparing 5.56mm to 223. They probably re-ground it. Nothing wrong with that.
__________________
R&D for AAC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2011, 09:35 AM
HUNTER2 HUNTER2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 231
Blackout - the best of both worlds. At least it is standarized. I have 2 300-221 and both have different throats, 1.4 and 1.3. A pain!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2011, 12:52 PM
rsilvers rsilvers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 482
Picking 300 Fireball or 300-221 now that 300 AAC BLACKOUT has been SAAMI approved would be like picking 22 Varminter (that is what 22-250 was called before it was standardized).
__________________
R&D for AAC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2011, 05:44 PM
ohnomrbillk ohnomrbillk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsilvers View Post
The chambers are not the same, it is like comparing 5.56mm to 223. They probably re-ground it. Nothing wrong with that.
I called Dave Kiff to ask on the reamer print my two 300 whispers are built on. He said the print number is the same for mine as the blackout. I guess I picked the right one......so I guess the difference is the Blackout starts with the letter "B"

I appreciate there were numerous chamber variations in the wildcat days. It is cool for all the new comers to get a standardized chamber with the Blackout.......but it is still 300 Whisper. Mr. Silvers likely has smoke rolling out of his ears on that one. Not arguing he deserves credit for submitting the cartridge through SAAMI. Not arguing that the recent burst of interest will help a great deal of us in new products being available.

Since the Whisper was never a SAAMI spec cartridge, I fail to see how one can apply the 556 vs 223 argument. The whisper was whatever the end user made it. The difference between my chamber and a blackout chamber is less than what difference you will find in individual gunsmith's preferences in verification of head space.

JD had thinner necks due to his use of the 221 case necked up. He decided to be grumpy and keep it exclusive. The rest of the world went with 300/221. One can argue the difference of the chamber's between the two, but it still is within most manufacturer's range of tolerance.

I own a S&W revolver in 45 Colt, a Ruger single action in 45 Colt, and a Marlin lever action in the "same" chambering. Throat sizes are different, and if one wants accuracy out of each with cast bullets, you size to a different diameter. The Smith and Marlin have loose enough chambers that I keep the brass separate. Should I start calling them 451 Ruger. 452 Marlin, and 453 S&W?

My Ruger MkII won't feed CCI subsonic to save its life. My BRNO Mod 4 eats them great. I guess one isn't a 22 LR?

If it were me, I'd use the chamber reamer everyone else is using, and have the barrel marked "300 ilike2hunt2", and you can make it your very own, just like everyone else has.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2011, 06:09 PM
Alleycat's Avatar
Alleycat Alleycat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Columbia, TN
Posts: 364
If AAC tells people that you can shoot the 300 Whisper, 300 Fireball, or 300-221 in a 300 Blackout chamber and someone blows themselves up ACC would be liable. You can't blame them for covering there ass.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2011, 07:37 PM
rsilvers rsilvers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohnomrbillk View Post
I appreciate there were numerous chamber variations in the wildcat days. It is cool for all the new comers to get a standardized chamber with the Blackout.......but it is still 300 Whisper.
Not true. The 300 AAC BLACKOUT chamber is designed to allow for higher velocity.

Yes, it will fire, but you cannot shoot full power 300 AAC BLACKOUT ammo in a 300 Whisper(R) chamber without exceeding SAAMI specs on max pressure.

Comparing 300 AAC BLACKOUT to 300 Whisper is like comparing 5.56mm to 223. They are not the same!
__________________
R&D for AAC
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2011, 11:07 PM
rsilvers rsilvers is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 482
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohnomrbillk View Post
Since the Whisper was never a SAAMI spec cartridge, I fail to see how one can apply the 556 vs 223 argument. The whisper was whatever the end user made it. The difference between my chamber and a blackout chamber is less than what difference you will find in individual gunsmith's preferences in verification of head space.
Headspace is allowed about a 0.006 range, while the throat in 300 AAC BLACKOUT is about 0.050 longer than in 300 Whisper(R) (about the same difference in the 6.8 SPC-II vs the 6.8 SPC throat).

300 Whisper(R) is proprietary but JDJ still has a fixed set of drawings for it. The 300 AAC BLACKOUT has a longer throat than 300 Whisper, just as 5.56mm does compared to 223.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohnomrbillk View Post
I own a S&W revolver in 45 Colt, a Ruger single action in 45 Colt, and a Marlin lever action in the "same" chambering. Throat sizes are different, and if one wants accuracy out of each with cast bullets, you size to a different diameter. The Smith and Marlin have loose enough chambers that I keep the brass separate. Should I start calling them 451 Ruger. 452 Marlin, and 453 S&W?
All of the chambers you just mentioned meet 45 Colt SAAMI specs as an allowable variation. The 300 Whisper(R) does not meet SAAMI specs for the 300 AAC BLACKOUT because the chamber is outside of the range allowed by the SAAMI drawing. Likewise, 223 does not meet the dimensional specs for 5.56mm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohnomrbillk View Post
My Ruger MkII won't feed CCI subsonic to save its life. My BRNO Mod 4 eats them great. I guess one isn't a 22 LR?
That would depend on if they are within the specs for 22lr.
__________________
R&D for AAC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.