Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > Knife Forums > Buck M9 Bayonet Topics
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2009, 06:24 PM
Avatheps Avatheps is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5
Thumbs up Buck M9 Sold

Thanks to all who responded to my add offering the M9 for sale. Much to my delight and amazement it has been sold and is on it,s way to a very happy new owner. My pond will be dug just as soon as six feet of ice and snow melt from the site. Thanks also for the great lesson I received about the history of the M9. I also had my faith in my fellow man bolstered by the dealings I have had here with members of this forum. You are a great bunch of people.
Regards from the frozen Adirondack Mts.
Bob Powers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2009, 09:12 PM
porterkids's Avatar
porterkids porterkids is offline
Super Moderator
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 675
Hi Bob,

I'm glad that you had a positive experience here. If you come across any other spectacular M9 bayonets be sure to let us know.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:06 AM
Carlo's Avatar
Carlo Carlo is offline
Senior Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 487
Buck USMC 1993 Full (Threaded) Tang

For was of you who wondered who was insane to spend so much money for this bayonet, well it is me!
You probably remember how fustrated I was when I lost the auction for a similar bayonet, last October.
Well, this one is even better, with the correct grip/decal on the scabbard.
Few shots (sorry for the lighting, I should improve my skills).
Things, in my opinion, to note:
1) how fragile is the threaded tang;
2) the shallower/smaller fuller on the blade;
3) the diamond stone on the scabbard;
4) the signs, on the scabbard, where the upper loops were originally;
5) the new, completely different, web assembly;
6) the grip "decal" and the sign of the snap under it;
7) the wire cutter plate is missing the screwdriver "tip" at the end (thanks to ColinG for pointing this out);
and, of course,
8) the full tang!
































Last edited by Carlo; 03-03-2009 at 07:08 AM. Reason: added something to note
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2009, 01:53 PM
porterkids's Avatar
porterkids porterkids is offline
Super Moderator
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 675
Carlo,

I'm glad you were finally able to get one of these for your collection. Looks like a really nice one. I must warn you to be extremely careful when assembling the bayonet that you do not tighten the screw too tight. I know of more than one of these that the end of the tang broke off. Also, the USMC did not want the bottle opener feature on the bayonet. Buck used the standard crossguards with the cut outs but put the crossguard on the tang with the cuts facing the grip. The first time I saw this I thought he guard was on backwards but later found out that it was installed that way intentionally.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:38 PM
Chris Johnson's Avatar
Chris Johnson Chris Johnson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 35
Sweet... Nice buy Carlo, Congrats
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2009, 11:43 PM
Mister Moon's Avatar
Mister Moon Mister Moon is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moon
Posts: 434
Bravo Carlo ! Forza Italia !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2009, 07:25 AM
Carlo's Avatar
Carlo Carlo is offline
Senior Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 487
Hello!
Thank you all for your comments!

Quote:
Originally Posted by porterkids View Post
Also, the USMC did not want the bottle opener feature on the bayonet. Buck used the standard crossguards with the cut outs but put the crossguard on the tang with the cuts facing the grip. The first time I saw this I thought he guard was on backwards but later found out that it was installed that way intentionally.
Nedless to say, I did not notice it when I first disassembled the bayonet to take a look at the full tang
After reading your post I quickly inverted crossguard so the bottle openers are now facing the grip
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2009, 08:42 AM
ColinG ColinG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 43
Buck Usmc 1993

Carlo, Bill,

Would another characteristic be that the screwdrver tip of the cutter plate is shaved off? I have seen this on two other 1993 USMCs. TIA

CG
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2009, 10:29 AM
Carlo's Avatar
Carlo Carlo is offline
Senior Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColinG View Post
Carlo, Bill,

Would another characteristic be that the screwdrver tip of the cutter plate is shaved off? I have seen this on two other 1993 USMCs. TIA

CG
Bill is the man to ask this question!
What I did notice is that in the picture that Bill posted on this topic
http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1808
he said that the wire cutter plate (which had the scredriver tip at the end) was not correct.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2009, 07:10 AM
Carlo's Avatar
Carlo Carlo is offline
Senior Member
M9 Bayonet Collectors Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 487
I added Colin's observation in my first post about the screwdriver tip.
Thanks for pointing this!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.