Quarterbore.Net Forums


Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > 300 Whisper Forums > 300 Whisper Ammo and Reloading
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2008, 07:00 PM
JFettig JFettig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 197
Charges and Seating Depth

I've been doing some research and some loading. I now have about 100 rounds through my 10.5" pistol.

I loaded 20 220 SMKs with 9.2gr of H110, a load I borrowed from spook, I did this only after verifying it with many other loads. I put 5 through a chronograph and they started at 940-50 and got up to 1070fps just in those 5 rounds, not very consistent. Some had flat primers and some weren't as flat. All of these were loaded to 2.220" I read that loads with H110 should not be reduced more than 3% rather than the normal 10% reduction, does this have to do with empty space and can it be fixed by changing seating depth? What is the best way to determine seating depth?

I have mainly shot 147gr Win FMJBT with 15 and 16gr of H110(started at 15), the 16gr H110 loads were mostly consistent at 1750-1780fps, I did get a few that I didn't put through the chronograph that the primers didn't flatten out as much as the rest. All of these are seated to 2.150".

From the ones that didn't flatten the primers much, the shoulders weren't blown out as much as the ones that had flat primers. I had no case head expansion on any of these cases.(formed LC 5.56 brass)

I plan to load some 165gr soft points, 125gr sp or hp, and determine what I want to shoot primarily. I don't have a can so I don't plan on shooting much for 220s, They do however have the most energy at long ranges when loaded supersonic.

What about loading light bullets subsonic, like 168 gr boat tails? The subsonic 220s I loaded were nice, light, and very quiet compared to the 147s.

Is there a more ideal powder than H110?


Thanks,
Jon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-12-2008, 12:25 AM
pug pug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 286
With a pistol you may be able to cycle 168gr loads you will have to try it and see. The gas port has to be larger the lighter the bullet you use but you may be fine. Since you have H110 on hand you can try 8.5gr with the 168s for subsonic and see.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2008, 01:00 PM
JFettig JFettig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 197
Any thoughts on seating depth and charge sizes for consistent shooting?

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2008, 11:45 PM
pug pug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 286
My notes say 2.200" for 168gr SMK with 8.5gr of H110 but that is all. Not whether it is starting load or most accurate.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2008, 12:15 AM
JFettig JFettig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 197
Thanks for the info pug, I'm more looking for that info on the 147 supersonics and primarily the 220 subs .

Shot 10 125gr TNTs at 2000fps, 2.100" OAL. All went off flawlessly.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2008, 04:18 AM
dksd39 dksd39 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 117
for my 220's I have 2 subsonic loads that are in the 1020-1050 range:
8.7gr LiL Gun
11.6gr RL7- this is a compressed load

as for seating- I have not played with it much
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.