Oldmanpaintball,
I recently re-shot some H110 loads with an ambient temp of 38 degrees and got significantly different results than I got this summer when temp was about 75 degrees.
The chrono data for the 75-80 degree day was 1813, 1817, 1836, 1869, and 1866 fps. When I re-shot the exact some load (I used the same lot of brass, primers and powder. Moreover, the powder for each round was individually weighted to within less than a 0.1 grains), the chrono data for the 38 degree day was 1710, 1768, 1747, 1765, and 1804 fps.
The velocities got faster as I progressed through the string. BOTH times. I think that H110 is somewhat temperature sensitive. I have said this before on this site and people reacted like I was a heretic.
Here is what I think is going on. As you fire the gun the chamber heats and the following chambered round warms-up in the chamber. If you are doing load development/chrono work you tend not to rapid fire (you read the chrono for that shot, check the spotting scope to se where the gun is printing etc...) so there is a significant amount of time for the round in the chamber to heat up. In addition, the gas that works the action also blows back through the magazine, heating up the ammo in the magazine. Next time you have your AR out look at the shells left in the magazine and you will notice powder residue on the brass.
If you want additional anecdotal evidence check out this site:
http://feistyrooster.com/300x221/300...rrelsplit.html
"I pulled down the gun and looked at my barrel.... It was split – none of the previous rounds had exited the barrel... you can see for yourselves, but it looks like the add-on bayonet lug helped keep the barrel from splitting completely.... I have no idea why things didn't work like they did the day before... temperature maybe? it was 20 degrees colder... wrong powder charge or omitted charge? can't be, I intenionally inspected all the cases with a flashlight before I seated the bullets. Each charge was individually weighed and inspected..."
My two cent worth
320pf