Quarterbore.Net Forums

Go Back   Quarterbore's Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Home Forums Classifieds Photo Server FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Showing results 1 to 10 of 10
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: Kurtis Dwight Davis
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-27-2011, 01:11 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
M-9 "rod, tang connecting"

Please be advised that Dickerman prior art, cited by Davis in U.S. Patent 4,458,420, is now available for your analysis. (photoserver) This prior art is a matter of offcial record, which cannot be...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-25-2011, 10:01 AM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
M-9 Testing

The original contract required Finn to yield two types of test results---those which assure minimum standards, and also results of destructive tests. Finn claimed to have submitted all required...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-21-2011, 10:00 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
[QUOTE=Mister Moon;22923][B][SIZE="4"]U.S. Patent...

[QUOTE=Mister Moon;22923][B][SIZE="4"]U.S. Patent 4,458,420 Shear pin hilt for knife
Abstract
An impact-resistant knife hilt comprising a hollow handle containing a clevis with shear pin connecting...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 01-25-2011, 03:27 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
Davis' information

Take your time Mr. Porter; I've been waiting for over 20 years, so no need to hurry! I truthfully and sincerely thank you and "Quarterbore" for giving me an opportunity to share what I know about...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 01-25-2011, 11:44 AM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
original correspondence

Please be advised personal correspondence from the original M-9 manufacturer is now available on this website. Go to photoserver, scroll down to the bottom of the page, and look under new photos. ...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 10-02-2010, 02:24 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
Scientific testing/M-9

Interesting picture. It's too bad the United States Army was unable to provide copy of actual test reports, as repeatedly ask for. Even worse would be the fact that the United States Army...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-31-2010, 09:26 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
Patent 4,458,420

The true test of infringement is whether or not one or more of the '420 claims may be applied to a fully assembled M-9 hilt, while said hilt is under pressure, or put to some kind of work. ...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-27-2010, 01:40 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
M-9 destructive testing

From my point of view, it seemed the Army wanted to sit at a desk and simply guess about the exact operation of the M-9 hilt. By doing so, they could avoid recognizing that operation of the hilt...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-26-2010, 12:42 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
Minimum standards

Minimum standards for durability of the M-9 were carefully defined in the original contract. These standards were supposed to be verified with destructive scientific testing. When asked to provide...
Forum: General M9 Bayonet Topics 08-21-2010, 03:37 PM
Replies: 29
Views: 11,557
Posted By Kurtis Dwight Davis
M-9 durability

Broken M-9's come as no surprise to me. I invented the impact resistant/modular design, as evidenced by U.S. Patent 4,458,420. The present form of the M-9 happens to be an ineffecient application...
Showing results 1 to 10 of 10

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.
Contact Us - Quarterbore's Forums - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.