Quarterbore's Forums

Quarterbore's Forums (http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/index.php)
-   LanCay M9 Bayonets (http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   CLEAR LANCAY YEAR ! ..... Proto 1 (http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/showthread.php?t=2480)

Carlo 05-27-2009 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porterkids (Post 12619)
That's because there would be no difference between it and a "legitimate" one.

Exactly!
Anyway, I will not bid on this clear example only because I'm more Phrobis/Buck "oriented". :grin:

Mister Moon 05-27-2009 09:36 AM

... Sure Carlo :grin: .... u will not put bid on it

:grin:

pwcosol 05-27-2009 10:17 AM

Just checked my clear first variation (LanCay). Fastex clip is dated 3/95. Because the MPBS is a modular system, it works as an advantage for either maintenance or upgrading the design during it's service life. However, this may or may not be beneficial for we collectors. Nearly any combination of parts can be assembled into a complete M9. A fair number of such bayonets (Lancay variants in particular) have appeared on the market in the past 15 years or so. If some of the scarcer Lancay military production M9s originated only from those produced & delivered to the Army, and not from over-runs or assembled from left-over parts procured from Lancay, I assure you there would be far fewer examples of these in collector hands!
In the book "American Gladius", Capt. Pattarozzi concentrates only on those known M9 variants as produced by Phrobis/Buck, Lancay, & Ontario delivered to the military. He discusses the difficulty in obtaining bonafide "issue" M9s as opposed to those sold commercially. This is why a provenance is of great help when acquiring any M9. The bottom line is any of us may have one or more M9 bayonet variations which are identical to a pattern produced for the US military, but were assembled after the fact. However, it may be impossible to establish this for certain. Therefore, so long as the bayonet conforms to the correct pattern it can be considered a legitimate example until proven otherwise.

porterkids 05-27-2009 02:17 PM

Well put Fred. That's basically what I was thinking.

Mister Moon 07-03-2009 08:11 AM

Again ... One CLEAR 2nd Model ...


http://cgi.ebay.com/Lan-Cay-Lucite-h...3A1%7C294%3A50

Mister Moon 07-12-2009 10:34 PM

1 Attachment(s)
... Today, one M9 CLEAR second VERSION Lan-Cay was sold for approximately 600 $ unfortunately, it seems that parts were not in accordance.. The 3 versions have no marking on the latching mechanism... Here is the photo that the salesman sent to me

Mister Moon 07-12-2009 10:47 PM

1 Attachment(s)
... here the correct " parts " NO-MARKING "

Carlo 07-13-2009 12:55 PM

Good observation Fabrizio!
As a side note: would you agree with me saying that in the case of the General Cutlery LanCay the most desiderable part of the bayonet is actually the blade, while on the clear Lan(-)Cay it is the plastic scabbard and handle?

Mister Moon 07-13-2009 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlo (Post 13927)
Good observation Fabrizio!
As a side note: would you agree with me saying that in the case of the General Cutlery LanCay the most desiderable part of the bayonet is actually the blade, while on the clear Lan(-)Cay it is the plastic scabbard and handle?


... yes. I beleive that u're right ... same for the GEN CUT .... the blade seem more important that absolutely nothing........... Other great example was the XM9 from Rex'y around 300 $ perhaps without the handle but : it was an X M 9 !

.. My opinion about the CLEAR is : 600 $ for the scabbard & the handle : was a good deal ... As we know, under 100 units made for the clear 2nd version.

Amen


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.