Quarterbore's Forums

Quarterbore's Forums (http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/index.php)
-   300 Whisper Rifles and Pistols (http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Animosity among calibers (http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/showthread.php?t=13829)

MMA10mm 02-19-2013 03:58 AM

Animosity among calibers
 
I've noticed in perusing Arfcom that there is not a small rivalry/animosity between supporters of the 300 Whisper/Blackout and of the 6.8 Rem. SPC.

I happen to really like both cartridges and see them as purposed and useful for two different (though occassionally overlapping) applications. I see the 300 as the ideal short-barrelled and/or suppressed assault rifle cartridge. So, for special ops teams who need quiet precision fire combined with the flexibility of a useful 300m assault carbine (when not suppressed), or for maximum utility (terminal ballistics) out of a super-short-barrelled carbine/SMG (such as the Mk.18) for non-spec ops personnel, such as vessel boarding teams, armored crews, house-clearing, etc. I see the 6.8 SPC as an ideal full-sized or carbine (anything with a barrel 14.5" or longer) assault rifle cartridge with superior ballistics to the 223 without all the weight, recoil, and need for larger-framed rifles as the 308 would require. The 300 is maximized in a 10-12" barrelled SMG/Carbine while the 6.8 reaches its ideal at 16-18".

So, I think these cartridges compliment each other and rarely cross over to competing with one another. Is the animosity simply because they are the only two real (SAAMI-approved) alternatives to the .223, and there is a sense of competition for survival, or is it just childish/un-reasoned rivalry?

Hoser 02-20-2013 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMA10mm (Post 42374)
just childish/un-reasoned rivalry?

Thats what gets my vote.

Titleiiredneck 02-20-2013 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoser (Post 42377)
Thats what gets my vote.

It's ar15.com, what do you expect?:cool:

MMA10mm 02-22-2013 12:02 AM

I think I'm seeing a pattern here... :wink:

L1A1Rocker 02-23-2013 09:45 PM

I have not seen a single 300BLK fan say a disparaging word about the 6.8. I HAVE seen a number of 6.8 fans post mis/dis information about the 300BLK and post 6.8 numbers without equal variables (like barrel length, chamber pressures, etc) In fact, I believe one person was banned for falsely claiming that Travis Haley was paid by AAC to promote the 300BLK. He was not - he just likes the round.

In my reading, the overall "nastiness" has been one sided.

Spook 02-25-2013 11:53 AM

here's another one they can argue about
 
http://i.imgur.com/fu5ZqdT.jpg

.416C ....450 grains of jacketed joy steaming down range at 1080 FPS :grin:

shot subsonic to 500 meters with VERY sub moa accuracy. :eek:

MMA10mm 02-26-2013 05:45 PM

Spook, is that one in the middle a 9x39?

Titleiiredneck 02-26-2013 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMA10mm (Post 42390)
Spook, is that one in the middle a 9x39?

.375 so no,there is shit for bullet selection for the .355/ 9mm in the USA .

Spook 02-26-2013 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMA10mm (Post 42390)
Spook, is that one in the middle a 9x39?

...only 20 thousandths difference so it might as well be ?

Titleiiredneck 02-27-2013 08:45 PM

It would make a kickass subsonic only ak round for a intergal ak. Would have to use a standard mag and I dunno if it would feed correctly.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.