Carlo
04-06-2009, 08:39 AM
I just came through an interesting Buck M9 1994.
The blade is missing the KL ***** markings we saw in the dutch topic, but there are, in my opinion, too many coincidences.
1) I purchased it directly from The Netherlands;
2) the blade has the correct 1994 marking (1995 dated Fastex);
3) the bayonet has the same carrier we saw in the dutch topic.
What do you think?
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6781/60835046.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/2794/80458406.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/4584/30307639.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/1543/89348707.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6721/15103405.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7599/54340763.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/5121/83559433.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/2686/76974337.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/60/77164496.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/3629/64275564.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/340/59391914.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/9596/22032780.jpg
The blade is missing the KL ***** markings we saw in the dutch topic, but there are, in my opinion, too many coincidences.
1) I purchased it directly from The Netherlands;
2) the blade has the correct 1994 marking (1995 dated Fastex);
3) the bayonet has the same carrier we saw in the dutch topic.
What do you think?
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6781/60835046.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/2794/80458406.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/4584/30307639.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/1543/89348707.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6721/15103405.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7599/54340763.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/5121/83559433.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/2686/76974337.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/60/77164496.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/3629/64275564.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/340/59391914.jpg
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/9596/22032780.jpg