Log in

View Full Version : So what exactly does a Taiwanese M9 look like? here's mine.


LazyEngineer
02-15-2008, 11:33 PM
This was also posted on AR15.com, but this actually seems the more appropriate forum

M9 Bayonet
2/14/2008

Today my “M9 Bayonet” showed up in the mail. I won this on an E-bay auction for a total of $61.65, shipped. This is less then half what a new one goes for retaiL, and the reason for that is because this isn’t an official made-in USA M9 bayonet. Which likely means it is not the same quality either. So what did I get?

The knife comes in a cardboard box with a small tag that says “Rothod”. The blade is marked as Stainless, Taiwan”. Here are some pictures:

Knife in scabbard. The knife is held in place by two snaps. One is attached to the scabbard, and one is attached to the belt clip. The scabbard can be disconnected from the beltclip so that you can deploy it more easily as a wirecutter

http://i32.tinypic.com/2r7oyg6.jpg

Knife out of scabbard
http://i29.tinypic.com/15ocrk7.jpg

other side:
http://i27.tinypic.com/219dnh2.jpg

markings
http://i28.tinypic.com/2zhdr7p.jpg

Pommel end
http://i31.tinypic.com/1ea06h.jpg

Blade end
http://i32.tinypic.com/15rh27n.jpg

looking down from top. What is the saw back designed to do? Is it for wood cutting? Is it any good at cutting sometime like soft steel, like rebar or a nail? Will that wreck it?
http://i28.tinypic.com/2k0okm.jpg

Sharp edge. Note that a 9mm Mag fits nicely, as does a Gerber multitool. The sharpened edge is still fairly thick: It’s 0.065” where the sharpening starts and is sharpened to an edge in about 0.06”, making for a 22° angle roughly to the blade edge. Perhaps a knife guru can comment on that, as I’m not actually sure what this means.
http://i30.tinypic.com/2ugm1d1.jpg

The mounting system is interesting. The sheath has a quick connect to a belt mount clip. The belt mount clip has a wire quick connect to that will attach around a belt. Is this the same as mil-spec? For some reason I thought mil-spec had a couple of funny wire clips that were supposed to connect to the eyeholes of a pistol belt/web belt. This doesn’t look like it connects to such eye holes.
http://i26.tinypic.com/sq1h0p.jpg

Wire cutter functionality. Initially the fit here was very very tight. There was a bur left in the hole in the blade, which made this difficult. I haven’t removed the bur yet, but will need to. This is not exactly as quick as a pair of wire cutters to deploy, but it does appear functional.
http://i27.tinypic.com/2ykyzht.jpg

here’s a closer look at the wire cutter end. Note the scratch on the T-lug from the bur. There’s also a large flat screwdriver blade on the end of the scabbard. As best I can tell, this blade is about right for the buffer tube screw head in the stock of an AR-15 – and darned little else.
http://i27.tinypic.com/28sc0hd.jpg

Just another closer look at the scabbard and the pouch. The pouch is attached by a Velcro strap and can be easily removed. A nifty feature. The scabbard has a spring petal inside that holds the blade securely, which keeps the blade from rattling around. It also has a bit of tension and deploying the knife takes one hand to hold the scabbard and one to pull – even when attached to a belt. This does not bother me any, but might some.
http://i31.tinypic.com/jgo1av.jpg

The scabbard has a built in sharpening stone. How cool is that?? The stone itself appears to be fairly coarse. It’s also dry. Question: is one to actually use this stone in anything other than an emergency? Does it need to be oiled or wetted before use? Since I have one of those nicer home sharpening kits (w/ the three stones and the angle guide), I probably will just use that to sharpen the blade.
http://i27.tinypic.com/oigm5s.jpg

Speaking of sharp – the blades has an edge, but I don’t know if I’d call it razor sharp. It'll cut - I just sliced a piece of paper in half with it. But my Gerber multi-tool has a considerably sharper edge. The Gerber also has a much thinner blade. I’m not sure what one is to expect of the knife edge of a bayonet. How sharp is an M-9 supposed to be? It’s got more of a machete edge than what I’d call a fine knife edge. Hopefully this can be polished up with a proper 3stone knife sharpening kit. Which leads me to my next question: when using such kits on such a blade, which angle on the stones would be best to use?

Here’s what it looks like mounted on an AR-15. Fit is snug and secure, but not what I’d call too tight or difficult. Both the lug on the rifle and the cuts on the bayonet indicate that one is to mount the bayonet simply by slipping it over the muzzle and jerking down. In practice, this isn’t working for me and I have to squeeze the little tabs to get it to slip over the lug. Perhaps I’m just not jerking hard enough. Doesn't bother me any, but might someone else.
http://i32.tinypic.com/k21ok5.jpg


Measured dimensions:
OAL: 12.84”
Blade: 7.75”
Blade thickness: 0.30” @tang; 0.25” @ lug hole
Blade height: 1.346”@ base; 1.44”@ blade
Fuller depth (some call this a “bloodgrove”): 1/8”
Mass: (not yet measured)
Metallurgy: 400 series stainless steel. Analyzed to be 86% Fe, 11.8% Cr, 0.78% Mn, upt 0.4% Ni, and some trace Ti - as well as various other trace metals. Margin of error on the analysis is +-0.5% in some cases, so this could be 420SS or 410 SS, both of which are good blade alloys. 420 SS is the spec I've seen used for US made M9's. I haven't run a hardness test on it, so can't say how well annealed. In any event, the metalurgy appears appropriate. The grip is Zytel, a hard plastic.
Color: The grip is an OD green color. The blade has a grey coating – I assume phosphate but should be able to measure that tomorrow w/ an analyzer. I was hoping the coating would have a more metallic appearance. In retrospect, I think a black coated blade looks sharper.

Overall impressions:
I rather like it! As to quality, I’m going to find out the metallurgy tomorrow. The heft and feel are great - not too heavy, not too light. Not too big, not too small. I love all the neat extra’s in this design – utility pouch, built in sharpening stone, wire cutter, etc. My overall impression of the quality is good – for a half priced knock-off. I have a critical eye and tried pointing out every flaw I saw, but with all that in mind, I’m rather happy with my purchase.

I’m sure a Buck or other US made knife is better in every way, but for me I could never justify spending 3 figures for a blade that, for me, is just a toy. So for the last 20 years, it’s been spend $100+ or not have one. And for 20 years I’ve chosen to not have one. If top quality is your goal and you don't begrudge the coin - I strongly encourage to buy American. If you're like me and you simply won't buy one for >$100, this might be the ticket. The only thing I'd do different is get the black blade. I'd also look into trying to bundle some kind of utility or Web belt with it.

LazyEngineer
02-15-2008, 11:54 PM
Aw, my picture links don't work here.

porterkids
02-16-2008, 12:01 AM
Don't worry, I went in and fixed them.

porterkids
02-16-2008, 12:12 AM
Hey LazyEngineer,

Welcome to the forum and thank you for the detailed write up on your Chinese M9. I have several different variations of the PRC and Taiwanese M9 bayonets. They all appear to be of decent quality. There are two things that I've noticed about these bayonets that make them stand out to me. The grips are slightly smaller in diameter than the standard US M9. It makes the hilt on the Chinese bayonets look a little out of proportion. The other item that is nothing other than a poor design is the method they used to fasten the blade stop to the cutter plate. They have a nice big stop on the face of the cutter plate, but if you look at it from the backside you will notice that the stop is held in place by a hollow body rivet. I don't think it would take too much use to shear that rivet.

I picked mine up when they first came available in the US. They were relatively inexpensive compared to a Phrobis or Buck M9. The Lan-Cay bayonets are available for about the same price that you paid for yours and they are made to USGI spec.

Quarterbore
02-16-2008, 03:11 PM
I have one that has just the letter and number code on the blade and I use it as a truck knife as I live in an area where we have lots of deer/car issues and I have used the knife to put down at least two deer.

The steel sharpens good enough and it does make a "good enough" and inexpensive truck or camp knife but I only paid about $35 for mine used so obviously that was significantly less expensive then any other option out there.

LazyEngineer
05-28-2008, 11:53 AM
Here's what it looks like upon dissassembly. I'm not a big fan of the fact that it's not a full length blade into the handle. Apparently they're all this way, since an examination of the Military M9 manual shows that US knives also are cut this way.

http://i29.tinypic.com/2ce6f49.jpg

porterkids
05-28-2008, 01:34 PM
Part of the overall design of the M9 bayonet was the seperate tang rod in place of a solid tang blade. The patent abstracts are available in this site's library. You can read up on the details and reason for it there.

Thanks for the photos. By the way, the company name on your bayonet if I'm not mistaken is "Rothco". The bayonets were made by Paul Medrano in Taiwan and wholesaled to Rothco.

porterkids
05-28-2008, 01:50 PM
http://www.m9bayonet.com/library.html

Carlo
05-28-2008, 01:57 PM
The following topic
http://www.quarterbore.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1770
could be of some help and provide (possibly) an easier research, as I posted in it the relevant patent's pictures/paragraphs about the full tang vs. separate tang configuration.