View Full Version : Wow, that 500-bullet box is HUGE (Sierra 240 HPBTs)
Quarterbore
04-24-2007, 11:26 PM
I have been stockpiling a number of my reloading components and I am late putting away a sizeable supply of 240s for the 300 Whisper but I was on Midway's site this past week and noticed they only had one of the 500-packs in stock so I bought it...
Well, the box was a whole lot bigger and heavier then I expected but now I have a supply of these missles that will last me a LONG time! Everybody has the 220 HPBTs in stock but the 240s seem to be a little harder to find these days...
320pf
04-25-2007, 12:38 AM
I just got that new 2007 Sierra bullet catalogue. The 240 gr bullets are not listed in the 2007 catalogue. It looks like they dropped the 240 gr bullets.
If this is the case, the heaviest bullet from Sierra will be the 220 MatchKings
320pf
Quarterbore
04-25-2007, 08:40 AM
That is not good news... I looked and the box I ordered must be 500-bullets and Miday has two back in stock:
http://www.midwayusa.com/eproductpage.exe/showproduct?saleitemid=621591
They must have more then a few of the 50-bullet boxes:
http://www.midwayusa.com/eproductpage.exe/showproduct?saleitemid=557247
I think they moved them under their specialty bullet heading for 2007 because I still see them there.
RWBlue
04-28-2007, 06:42 PM
What is your load for the 240gr 300-221?
I assume your load is subsonic?
Will it function in an AR?
For me I used up a partial box early on and found they didn't stabilize completely in my AR-15 so went with something lighter. Primarily using 180s now for both subsonic and supersonic until I make a faster twist barrel.
320pf
04-29-2007, 07:02 PM
Pug,
I agree with you, 180 gr bullets are pretty good all-around bullets for the 300. I am going to work up some loads for 165 and 168 gr bullets next.
What loads are you using for your 180 gr bullets. I am using 16.4 gr of W296 and getting 1830 fps out of a 16 in. Olymp. Arms barrel. My subsonic load is 8.5 of AA#9 for about 1050 fps.
320pf
320pf,
Are you still using the 180 SGKs for your loads? I will have to say that 180 load on RN using LIL'GUN gave me a pause when I examined the brass but pressure signs dropped when I switched to the round nose which has a little less drag coefficient. My most accurate 180 load is Speer 180gr RNSP set to 2.225 over 16.5 gr N110. I am currently working hunting loads for knock down power and that one has a trajectory of 1.5" out to 100 yds. delivering 1500 fps at 1000 ft-lbs at that distance. Muzzle velocity is right at 1800 fps. I have been much higher with lil'gun and the 180 RN but the brass takes a beating in the AR-15 with its chamber cut to "automatic" type specs.
320pf
04-30-2007, 02:04 AM
Pug,
Yes I am still using 180 gr SGKs. My 180 SGK W296 load is very consistent. I typically get standard deviations of 10 fps or less and better than 1 in groups at 100 yrds. I have not tried a rapid fire test with the 180 gr loads (basically a 30 round mag dump). In some of the competitions that I shoot a stage will require a shooter to shoot 15 to 20 targets two hits each (30 to 40 rounds) in about 30 to 40 sec. On some of my other loads that I have tried, I have noticed that in the rapid fire mode the cycle rate on an AR15 can increase a bit as the gun warms up and the gun will try and eject a round too early and tear the rim off and leave the spent round in the chamber. This really can ruin your day at a shooting match. I think this problem is mostly a due to the gas port being in the pistol position and the port being too large. For this reason, I am probably going to back off from 16.4 gr to 16.0 16.2 gr of W296 a bit and try to get ~1800 fps.
Also, I am a bit disappointed in the lot-to-lot variation is some of these powders. I got a new can of Lil'Gun and reworked the loads. Basically this new batch is a lot hotter. I got to 15.8 gr of Lil'Gun behind the 180GMK and get about 1880 fps. But I think it is a bit too close to the ragged edge. I am also going drop this load back to about 1800 fps and see which to the two loads gives me the best overall performance (low pressure indicators and good groups etc...).
Your info in the round nose bullets is interesting. Again some of the stages that I shoot have targets out to 150 to 300 yrds... I would think that the round nose bullets might have too much drop.
On a different but somewhat related note. If my memory is correct you are shooting a 16 in Olympic Arms barrel with the gas port in the pistol position. Is that correct?
I have a new Noveske 16 in. barrel. On the Noveske barrel gas port is 0.5 further down the barrel toward the muzzle than the Olympic Arms barrel. Also the gas port on the Noveske barrel is 0.071 in. in diameter compared to 0.080 in for the Olympic barrel. The Noveske sure shoots well. The bolt seems to cycle a bit softer and the brass was not getting flung as hard and far as my Olympic Arms barrel. I still have to try some subsonic loads out on this barrel/gas port configuration.
I think that for full power super sonic loads the gas port in the carbine position will run better. So I have a second Olympic Arms barrel and I drilled a new gas port in the carbine position last night. I am waiting for a carbine length gas tube and and gas block that I can use to close off the gas port in the pistol position. I will let you know how my experiment works.
320pf
Quarterbore
04-30-2007, 01:36 PM
What is your load for the 240gr 300-221?
I assume your load is subsonic?
Will it function in an AR?
I don't have one yet :grin:
Up to this year, all of my 300 Whispers are non-semiauto:
AR-15 Bolt Action Pistol in 300 Whipser
T/C Contender Pistol (Note - this will never shoot subsonics well b/c of twist)
Rem 700 LTR Clone 1:8 twist
About a month or more ago I just added a J&T 300 Whipser upper with the 1:8 twist so now I need to work up a semiauto AND fullauto capable load!
I plan to get an adaptor to allow me to use my Fisher UZI supressor (9mm cans will work with the 300 whipser) along with the Lightning Link) to allow me the option of full auto subsonic 300 Whisper loads.
Eventually, I want to get a Gem-Tech HRT but darned .gov folks are making me spend money on more Evil Black Rifles that I think are at a bigger risk of being banned again...
320pf the very things you are experiencing is why I dropped back to 1800 fps. In the pursuit of ever higher velocities I had a premature extraction which ruptured the case which in turn blew the extractor off, bent the bolt, broke the carrier in two, blew the bolt catch off and mushroomed the magazine. Combination of gas turned up to high and load too hot.
I will have to calculate the drop for the round nose out to 300 but I know you are correct. I believe it is like 36 inchs but will run the internal and external ballistics program and see what it says for 200 and 300 yards.
I also think the carbine is better suited for supersonic use. The gases are awfully hot coming out the port so close to the chamber which brings me to you blocking off your gas port with a gas block (perhaps turning it around backwards?). Aluminum can't stand up to the hot gas erosion and the gases will burn a hole right through the block. Ask me how I know. Steel is better choice with stainless the best. I think you already know but the OA barrels take a .760 block so either you use theirs or turn the barrel down or bore the block out. I am going to leave my Oly with opened up gas port for dedicated subsonic use and work on another barrel for supersonic use. Still would like to use those 350pf rounds :).
edited to add I meant before the round nose has less drag in the bore due to less rifling engagement not less drag in the air.
If you were interested the drop calculated for 300 yds with a muzzle velocity of 1800 fps. 100 yard zero.
180gr SGK 36"
180gr SMK 37"
180gr SRN 42"
180gr Speer RN 42"
178gr A-MAX 37"
185gr Lapua FMJBT 36"
320pf
05-01-2007, 06:57 PM
pug,
Thanks for running the balistics.
check your private messages
320pf
redtazdog
05-02-2007, 05:17 PM
Balistic,energy,recoil and more to test.
http://sst.benchrest.com/
RWBlue
05-03-2007, 02:19 AM
I don't have one yet :grin:
Up to this year, all of my 300 Whispers are non-semiauto:
uh-oh, I thought you had it all.:eek:
Any suggested loads to start with?
320pf
05-03-2007, 07:34 AM
If you are looking for some sub sonic load data here is a good place to start.
http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Handgun/Standarddata/30Cal(7.62mm)/300%20Whisper%20page%2076.pdf
I have tried both the 165 and 190-180 (with 180 Sierra GK) loads using AA#9.
These loads all cycled my 16-in barrel AR (Olympic Arms barrel). The gas system on this gun in in the pistol postion and the port diameter is 0.80-in.
I shot a match last month (~200 rounds) with these loads... the gun funcioned flawlessly. I was even able to use a beta-c mag.
I have posted all of my reloading data here:
http://reloadersnest.com/frontpage.asp?CaliberID=135
My loads are all listed under "Not yet verified user loads"
Good luck and have fun
320pf
HHI 812
05-06-2007, 06:21 AM
Anyone care to part with some 240 SMK your not using or could spare? Want to try some, but can't see buying a 500 pack for shooting in my single shot T/C?
Thanks,
Dennis
e-mail at dennis.madriaga@gmail.com
RWBlue
05-06-2007, 03:12 PM
Anyone care to part with some 240 SMK your not using or could spare? Want to try some, but can't see buying a 500 pack for shooting in my single shot T/C?
Thanks,
Dennis
e-mail at dennis.madriaga@gmail.com
If you were local I would hand you 5 or 10 and let you play, but when you consider time and shipping and.....
You can get 50 of them from Midwayusa, for $23.49 + shipping.
HHI 812
05-06-2007, 03:51 PM
Thanks RWblue!
RWBlue
05-10-2007, 11:22 PM
Thanks RWblue!
No problem, but please post your info as you develop it. We are all learning from each other.
WhisperFan
05-11-2007, 02:51 AM
No problem, but please post your info as you develop it. We are all learning from each other.
I read somwhere that 9.9 of AA #9 was a subsonic load for 220 SMK's
I loaded up about 8 to try and they were subsonic out of my 10.5" 1-in-8 pistol barrel, but they broke the sound barrier in my 18" 1-in-7 twist PacNor barreled Remington 700.
I guess the longer barrel allowed for a longer burn time and a faster muzzle velocity.
I have an 8# keg of AA#9, so I am pretty much married to that - any suggstions as to a load that will be subsonic in both rifles?
320pf
05-11-2007, 08:49 AM
Whispefan,
The Accurate reloading manual lists 8.2 grains of AA#9 pushing a Sierra 220 HPBT out of a 16" barrel at 1056 fps. So I suggest that you back-off the 9.9 load until you just go subsonic in you 18" barrel and then you should get the results that you are looking for.
http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/P...0page%2076.pdf
I have tried both the 165 and 190-180 (with 180 Sierra GK) loads using AA#9 and have been able to reproduce the loads found the loads listed in the Accurate manual.
Here is one that works very well in my 16" AR15.
7.5 AA#9 pushing a Sierra 180 HPBT at 1034 fps
http://reloadersnest.com/unverified_detail.asp?CaliberID=135&ID=3009
So I think that if you try out the loads listed in the Accurate reloading manual you should get the result that you are looking for.
320pf
AR15barrels
07-09-2007, 05:05 PM
I happened into an old 500ct box of 250gr Sierra MK's on eBay several years ago and I have been using them sparingly.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.